Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spiritual Death"
Nathan000000 (talk | contribs) |
Nathan000000 (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially | + | I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially for a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article? —[[User:Nathan000000|Nathan000000]] |
| + | |||
| + | This is really excellent. I just changed the scriptural references from abbreviations to full words, for the benefit of those who are not so familiar with the scriptures. And I added some internal links. Thank you for this effort! —[[User:Gboyd|Gboyd]] 19:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:11, 14 February 2011
I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially for a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article? —Nathan000000
This is really excellent. I just changed the scriptural references from abbreviations to full words, for the benefit of those who are not so familiar with the scriptures. And I added some internal links. Thank you for this effort! —Gboyd 19:56, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
