Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stake patriarch"
From MormonWiki
Southidaho (talk | contribs) |
(I think I'll revert.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | There were some recent changes that seem to make things less comprehensible. What was the intended meaning for that latest edit? I'll probably revert or edit things back myself unless I can figure out what things mean now. (I'll probably do it manually, as it's apparent the previous version had some correctable grammar problems.) -[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 10:08, 28 September 2007 (MDT) | + | There were some recent changes that seem to make things less comprehensible. What was the intended meaning for that latest edit? I'll probably revert or edit things back myself unless I can figure out what things mean now. (I'll probably do it manually, as it's apparent the previous version had some correctable grammar problems.) -[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 10:08, 28 September 2007 (MDT) |
| + | |||
| + | There were some grammar problems in original article forked over from Patriarch to the church. Ones I wrote. I edited that yesterday but was more awkward. Just edited that now for grammatical reasons. Hopefully easier to understand now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Southidaho, I don't know, it looks worse to me. If you'd like a full critique, I can provide you with that, in case you might find it helpful. Since no information seems to have been added, I think I'll revert and edit the grammatical problem that I had noted existed in the original. Also, for the sake of talk pages, I recommend looking at [[User talk:Seanmcox#Signing Your Posts|this]]. --[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 30 September 2007
There were some recent changes that seem to make things less comprehensible. What was the intended meaning for that latest edit? I'll probably revert or edit things back myself unless I can figure out what things mean now. (I'll probably do it manually, as it's apparent the previous version had some correctable grammar problems.) -Seanmcox 10:08, 28 September 2007 (MDT)
There were some grammar problems in original article forked over from Patriarch to the church. Ones I wrote. I edited that yesterday but was more awkward. Just edited that now for grammatical reasons. Hopefully easier to understand now.
- Southidaho, I don't know, it looks worse to me. If you'd like a full critique, I can provide you with that, in case you might find it helpful. Since no information seems to have been added, I think I'll revert and edit the grammatical problem that I had noted existed in the original. Also, for the sake of talk pages, I recommend looking at this. --Seanmcox
