Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forbidden fruit"
From MormonWiki
(Planning to roll back.) |
(Done with edits.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Well, my plan is to roll back to the original post as it seems accurate enough and certainly better than nothing. I'll do that in a few days unless I meet with some objection. --[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 21:56, 30 August 2007 (MDT) | Well, my plan is to roll back to the original post as it seems accurate enough and certainly better than nothing. I'll do that in a few days unless I meet with some objection. --[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 21:56, 30 August 2007 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've restored the page and removed some speculative material (which in a stub like this, is a big cut). Perhaps this material is what had annoyed. (I should say with good reason.) --[[User:Seanmcox|Seanmcox]] 17:40, 3 September 2007 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 3 September 2007
I am not sure that this is the real meaning of the forbidden fruit
- Gmartinengo, a signature would be nice for conversation. (Like this: ~~~~) Nevertheless, what are your thoughts on the forbidden fruit? (especially in contrast with what had been written)--Seanmcox 16:04, 6 August 2007 (MDT)
Well, my plan is to roll back to the original post as it seems accurate enough and certainly better than nothing. I'll do that in a few days unless I meet with some objection. --Seanmcox 21:56, 30 August 2007 (MDT)
I've restored the page and removed some speculative material (which in a stub like this, is a big cut). Perhaps this material is what had annoyed. (I should say with good reason.) --Seanmcox 17:40, 3 September 2007 (MDT)
