Difference between revisions of "User talk:Reds0xfan"
From MormonWiki
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please let me know of any feedback you help regarding my edits. I am interested in making this site very helpful and accurate. | Please let me know of any feedback you help regarding my edits. I am interested in making this site very helpful and accurate. | ||
| − | *Your stub template is more helpful in taking a second look at it. The reason I made the change is there is already a category/template for Stub (see below [[Category:Stub]]) and I'm trying to keep things consistent throughout and we don't need two different stub categories. 13: | + | *Your stub template is more helpful in taking a second look at it. The reason I made the change is there is already a category/template for Stub (see below [[:Category:Stub]]) and I'm trying to keep things consistent throughout and we don't need two different stub categories. [[User:Amaranth|Amaranth]] 14:00, 3 August 2006 (MDT) |
| + | |||
| + | *You are correct, however, a Template is different and more robust than a category, and by moving things to a category, you lost some of the template functionality. How is your knowledge of the difference between a category and a template? [[User:reds0xfan|reds0xfan]] 14:13, 3 August 2006 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *We should keep the Stubs category instead of Stub. But we should use Template:Stub over Template:MormonWiki-stub. [[User:Tallred]] 14:25, 3 August 2006 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Okay, I admittedly don't know much about stubs and templates. From what I can tell, we don't really have that many stub articles and we probably don't need many stub categories. The BOM Character stub and an all-purpose stub could probably suffice. I would recommend being consitent. Since I have plenty of other projects, I'll leave stubs to reds0xfan and Tallred and stick with categorization.[[User:Amaranth|Amaranth]] 14:38, 3 August 2006 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 3 August 2006
Please let me know of any feedback you help regarding my edits. I am interested in making this site very helpful and accurate.
- Your stub template is more helpful in taking a second look at it. The reason I made the change is there is already a category/template for Stub (see below Category:Stub) and I'm trying to keep things consistent throughout and we don't need two different stub categories. Amaranth 14:00, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
- You are correct, however, a Template is different and more robust than a category, and by moving things to a category, you lost some of the template functionality. How is your knowledge of the difference between a category and a template? reds0xfan 14:13, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
- We should keep the Stubs category instead of Stub. But we should use Template:Stub over Template:MormonWiki-stub. User:Tallred 14:25, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
- Okay, I admittedly don't know much about stubs and templates. From what I can tell, we don't really have that many stub articles and we probably don't need many stub categories. The BOM Character stub and an all-purpose stub could probably suffice. I would recommend being consitent. Since I have plenty of other projects, I'll leave stubs to reds0xfan and Tallred and stick with categorization.Amaranth 14:38, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
