Difference between revisions of "Adam-God Theory"
Dan Forward (talk | contribs) (Added definition, possible explanation, and refutation by President Kimball.) |
(Categorized, added some links, and updated style.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The Adam-God | + | The [[Adam-God Theory]] suggests that [[Adam and Eve|Adam]], who foremost fell that man might be, may be the same being as God the Father, the father of our spirits and the physical father of Jesus Christ. This idea has been construed from comments, never fully explained, by President [[Brigham Young]], the second prophet and President of [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]. |
| − | It is useful to note that "Adam" is a title, which means "first man." God explained to Moses, "And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many" (Moses 1:34). God the Father is also a Man, for "in the language of Adam, Man of Holiness is his name, and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man" (Moses 6:57). Since God the Father is the progenitor of Adam and Eve, the title of "first man" or "Adam" might equally apply to Him. This is one possible explanation of President Young's comments on the matter. | + | It is useful to note that "Adam" is a title, which means "first man." God explained to [[Moses]], "And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many" (Moses 1:34). God the Father is also a Man, for "in the language of Adam, Man of Holiness is his name, and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man" (Moses 6:57). Since God the Father is the progenitor of Adam and Eve, the title of "first man" or "Adam" might equally apply to Him. This is one possible explanation of President Young's comments on the matter. |
| − | In 1897, Wilford Woodruff, then President of the Church, wrote a private letter concerning the Adam-God theory, stating: | + | In [[1897]], [[Wilford Woodruff]], then President of the Church, wrote a private letter concerning the Adam-God theory, stating: |
| − | The doctrine was never submitted to the councils of the Priesthood nor to the church for approval or ratification, and was never formally or otherwise accepted by the church. It is therefore in no sense binding upon the Church. Brigham Young's "bare mention" was "without indubitable evidence and authority being given of its truth." Only the scripture, the "accepted word of God," is the Church's standard | + | <blockquote> |
| + | The doctrine was never submitted to the councils of the Priesthood nor to the church for approval or ratification, and was never formally or otherwise accepted by the church. It is therefore in no sense binding upon the Church. Brigham Young's "bare mention" was "without indubitable evidence and authority being given of its truth." Only the scripture, the "accepted word of God," is the Church's standard. | ||
| + | :~Letter to A. Saxey, January 7, 1897, HDC | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| − | President Spencer W. Kimball flatly denounced the idea as false in the October 1976 General Conference as follows: | + | President [[Spencer W. Kimball]] flatly denounced the idea as false in the October [[1976]] [[General Conference]] as follows: |
| − | + | <blockquote> | |
| + | We hope that you who teach in the various organizations, whether on the campuses or in our chapels, will always teach the orthodox truth. We warn you against the dissemination of doctrines which are not according to the scriptures and which are alleged to have been taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations. Such, for instance, is the Adam-God theory. We denounce that theory and hope that everyone will be cautioned against this and other kinds of false doctrine. | ||
| + | :~Spencer W. Kimball, "Our Own Liahona," Ensign, November 1976, p. 77 | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Controversial Topics]] | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 10 September 2007
The Adam-God Theory suggests that Adam, who foremost fell that man might be, may be the same being as God the Father, the father of our spirits and the physical father of Jesus Christ. This idea has been construed from comments, never fully explained, by President Brigham Young, the second prophet and President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
It is useful to note that "Adam" is a title, which means "first man." God explained to Moses, "And the first man of all men have I called Adam, which is many" (Moses 1:34). God the Father is also a Man, for "in the language of Adam, Man of Holiness is his name, and the name of his Only Begotten is the Son of Man" (Moses 6:57). Since God the Father is the progenitor of Adam and Eve, the title of "first man" or "Adam" might equally apply to Him. This is one possible explanation of President Young's comments on the matter.
In 1897, Wilford Woodruff, then President of the Church, wrote a private letter concerning the Adam-God theory, stating:
The doctrine was never submitted to the councils of the Priesthood nor to the church for approval or ratification, and was never formally or otherwise accepted by the church. It is therefore in no sense binding upon the Church. Brigham Young's "bare mention" was "without indubitable evidence and authority being given of its truth." Only the scripture, the "accepted word of God," is the Church's standard.
- ~Letter to A. Saxey, January 7, 1897, HDC
President Spencer W. Kimball flatly denounced the idea as false in the October 1976 General Conference as follows:
We hope that you who teach in the various organizations, whether on the campuses or in our chapels, will always teach the orthodox truth. We warn you against the dissemination of doctrines which are not according to the scriptures and which are alleged to have been taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations. Such, for instance, is the Adam-God theory. We denounce that theory and hope that everyone will be cautioned against this and other kinds of false doctrine.
- ~Spencer W. Kimball, "Our Own Liahona," Ensign, November 1976, p. 77
