Difference between revisions of "User talk:Reds0xfan"
From MormonWiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*You are correct, however, a Template is different and more robust than a category, and by moving things to a category, you lost some of the template functionality. How is your knowledge of the difference between a category and a template? [[User:reds0xfan|reds0xfan]] 14:13, 3 August 2006 (MDT) | *You are correct, however, a Template is different and more robust than a category, and by moving things to a category, you lost some of the template functionality. How is your knowledge of the difference between a category and a template? [[User:reds0xfan|reds0xfan]] 14:13, 3 August 2006 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *We should keep the Stubs category instead of Stub. But we should use Template:Stub over Template:MormonWiki-stub. [[User:Tallred]] 14:25, 3 August 2006 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:25, 3 August 2006
Please let me know of any feedback you help regarding my edits. I am interested in making this site very helpful and accurate.
- Your stub template is more helpful in taking a second look at it. The reason I made the change is there is already a category/template for Stub (see below) and I'm trying to keep things consistent throughout and we don't need two different stub categories. Amaranth 14:00, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
- You are correct, however, a Template is different and more robust than a category, and by moving things to a category, you lost some of the template functionality. How is your knowledge of the difference between a category and a template? reds0xfan 14:13, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
- We should keep the Stubs category instead of Stub. But we should use Template:Stub over Template:MormonWiki-stub. User:Tallred 14:25, 3 August 2006 (MDT)
