Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mormon Gays"

Revision as of 21:43, 21 August 2007

Redundancy Problem

This article seems to discuss gays in general rather than Mormon gays, which very well may deserve a page of its own. I would therefore propose a fork or that this page be renamed. --Seanmcox 00:48, 23 July 2007 (MDT)

To my mind the article is saying if you are gay and are practicing you are sinning. So agreed, the article does seem to be discussing gays in general. Rickety 06:21, 24 July 2007 (MDT)

OK, I'm adding a list here of related pages I've been able to find along with my suggestion as to what we might do with them. --Seanmcox 13:12, 7 August 2007 (MDT)

However, my Mother did teach me that it is the thought that counts. Rickety 18:01, 21 August 2007 (MDT)

8^D Seanmcox 22:43, 21 August 2007 (MDT)

Related Pages

• Homosexuality - Seems a good page that can stand on its own.
• Gay - A redundent copy of Homosexuality. It should probably be made a redirect to either Homosexuality or Same-sex attraction. Another thought is to move it to Gays and make it a page about the people rather than the term/concept. (Of course we'd need content for that. We might pull from Mormon Gays)
• Same-sex attraction - Seems a good page that stands on its own.
• Mormon Gays - Currently a genral page about homosexuals and homosexuality. This is redundant. Furthermore, the name brings to mind homosexuals who are also members of the church, but the page doesn't deal with that topic specifically. That should probably be what this page should be about. The content is good. I think the content could be farmed out to one of the other pages. A stub could probably be created easily enough.