Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spiritual Death"
From MormonWiki
Nathan000000 (talk | contribs) (Permission to make large deletions?) |
Nathan000000 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially to a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article? | + | I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially to a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article? |
Revision as of 17:24, 29 April 2009
I felt that the article from 2008 was unclear, so in January 2009 I added the "Two Types of Spiritual Death" section at the beginning of the article. I did not have the time to go through the older half of the article and clean it up or remove any redundancies created by my addition. I think the article would greatly benefit from such a clean-up, but it would involve hacking out large portions of the old article. I didn't know if that would be a breach of etiquette, especially to a new-comer like me, so I haven't done it yet. Does anyone have any preferences one way or the other? Should I go ahead and completely revise the old sections of the article?
